As a researcher in my respective field, I’ve observed a significant misconception about the scientific paradigm. The scientific method often appears rigid and inflexible. One contributing factor to this dogma is our society’s limited spiritual engagement with the vast cosmos and the nature of the physical universe. For centuries, we’ve been entangled in disputes over whose God is superior, among other things.
One of the misconceptions I’ve encountered relates to what occurs to matter as it approaches the center of a galaxy. It is commonly said that matter is compressed at the galactic center. However, when we examine astrophotographs of galaxies, the center is often depicted as a brilliant white sphere of light.
It’s crucial to understand that when the Hubble Telescope captures images of celestial objects, it employs high-frequency technology to record the object’s high-frequency light. This suggests that the scientific method primarily relies on the strict definition of “observation.” If something cannot be observed with the naked eye or dissected, it is often dismissed as non-existent or relegated to the realm of metaphysical thought.
Did our ancestors possess knowledge about surpassing the speed of light?
The Canadian website, Spira Solaris, delves deeply into the phyllotaxis pattern in the solar system and the arrangement of leaves. The arrangement of leaves in plants can be expressed using a series of simple fractions, which are gradual approximations of 1/2 and 1/3. Peirce has uncovered a remarkable correspondence between the fundamental laws governing these leaf patterns and the movements of celestial bodies within our solar system.
While some may consider this reminiscent of Pythagorean philosophy, Pythagoras, known in the 6th century BC, was not just a philosopher but also a mathematician, mystic, and scientist. His quest for knowledge even led him to Egypt, where he likely learned mystical teachings at a mystery school.
On Spira Solaris, there’s an appendix titled “THE MATTER OF LOST LIGHT” that elaborates on how PHI (1.61803399) could be the mathematical key to transforming matter into light energy, maintaining energy consistency.
Consider this scenario: Einstein’s equation, E=MC^2. According to Sixty Symbols, the significance of C^2 remains uncertain. It’s often regarded as a constant, representing consistency. The spiral form is renowned for its consistency.
Now, let’s substitute 1.61803399 into E=MC^2.
E = M • (1.61803399)^2
When matter is squared by PHI, it seems to dematerialize and transform into light again.
Take the atomic mass of carbon and plug it into our revised equation.
E = 12.011 • (1.61803399)^2
E = 12.011 • 2.61803399
E (light) = 31.44520625398 m/s (miles per second)
This 31.44520… m/s represents the energy that carbon could yield. If only there were a way to rigorously test this hypothesis.
